Dale Yu: Considering the Pros and Cons of Brettspielwelt
Having spent a bit more time than usual this month on www.Brettspielwelt.de (BSW), I started to think about how it has affected my gaming over the years. I have been a member there since October 2002 (username is yudp in case you want to look for me) – and I have seen my opinion of the site change over the years. My recent experience with it has led me to ask the question: Is BSW the “killer app” of boardgaming?
The use of the term “killer app” may be a bit out of place as it is usually used to refer to a computer program or application “that is so necessary or desirable that it proves the core value of some larger technology, such as computer hardware like a gaming console, operating system or other software” (taken from Wikipedia). What I am wondering here is: Do I need BSW in my gaming life? Can I live without it?
First, let me explain a bit about Brettspielwelt. It is an online site where you can play Eurogames. The roster of games constantly changes, but there are currently 35 multiplayer games available for play on the website – the full list can be seen at: http://www.brettspielwelt.de/Spiele/?nation=en . There is no cost to join the site or to play the games, and it is online for almost the entire day (there is a short period of time each day when the site is offline to run daily upkeep).
So… what do I see good and bad about BSW?
Pro: It’s Free – there is no cost to play on BSW. If you’re new to the system, you simply create an account and you can be in a game within 30 minutes! Though I’m not entirely sure how the system supports itself, I am aware that many game publishers pay/donate money to BSW in order to have their games hosted on the site.
Con: Because it’s free, there isn’t a lot of input that the users get into the system. The game selection changes often (likely due to agreements/contracts between the game publishers and BSW) and without much advance notice.
Pro: It’s available around the clock. It doesn’t matter what timezone you happen to be in, you should be able to log onto BSW and play a game in real time with other gamers around the world. Now, you don’t have to wait for your local game group’s meeting each week – you can play anytime you want from the comfort of your own home!
Con: It’s available around the clock. BSW can be a serious time suck and productivity killer. Having access to gaming around the clock is not necessarily a good thing. When I used to work from home, I often found it hard to finish my monthly reports knowing that I could be playing a game of Web of Power or Emerald instead!
Pro: You don’t need to have any friends around to play games! BSW removes that pesky restriction of needing to have multiple people in the same room to play a game in real time. If you don’t have a regular group or consistent game nights, you can still try out many of the newest games at your convenience!
Con: It removes a lot of the social aspect of gaming. At least for me, a lot of the joy in gaming is using the game as a way to get together with friends (or at least people with similar interests) and spend a few hours socializing. I often enjoy the conversation / camaraderie of the gaming event as much as the games themselves! Yes, there is a chat system that allows you to chat and kibbitz with the other gamers on the BSW system, but for me, this is not a replacement for direct face-to-face interaction.
Pro: The games are presented with a nice graphic interface. The coders at BSW have done an amazing job at creating nice graphic interfaces to play the games. For the most part, once you start a game, all you need is a mouse to get through a game.
Con: Sometimes the interfaces are non-intuitive. There is often a learning curve of a game or two as you learn where/when/how you need to click to do the things you want to do in the game. Frustratingly, there is not an “Undo” button either. So… if you click in the wrong place, you may end up passing your turn unintentionally or doing something that you really didn’t want to do – and there’s no way to take it back.
Pro: There is a metagame at BSW which can further attract you to the site. The meta-game at BSW is similar to the experience points that a Dungeons and Dragons character would collect. Each time you play a game at BSW, you receive a certain number of experience points. As your point total increases, your avatar will gain a higher level. As your level increases, you get the ability to use more commands in the BSW world. Get high enough, and you’ll be able to create your own house in the BSW world and perhaps even host a gameroom of your favorite game in your house! Additionally, you can apply for citizenship in a city (kind of like a guild) which furthers the sense of community in your BSW play.
Con: The metagame isn’t all good (IMHO). There are all sorts of statistics that are kept by the system including won-loss percentages. It is sadly not uncommon for someone to unexpectedly leave a game just as they are about to lose (ostensibly to protect their won/loss ratio). It doesn’t happen a lot, but it is really frustrating for me to not be able to finish a game.
Pro: You can play some games much faster on BSW. Having the game do all of the setup and bookkeeping makes playing some games much faster. The first game that opened my eyes to this was Power Grid. We seemed to be able to fly through games online of this compared to face-to-face games. Dominion is another game that seems to go faster on BSW as the setup and shuffling are all done instantaneously by the computer.
Con: Some games are too fast of BSW… and others are too slow! I have found that some games of Dominion can run too fast for some gamers to properly process. Since a turn can be done in seconds when all you have to do is click a few times, it is sometimes very difficult to process what your opponents have done on their turn. On the flip side, some games can be painfully long on BSW. Any game that requires a lot of interaction between the players can be slower as the system has to wait for all players to check in at each stage of the game before it can progress.
Pro: BSW is a great way to get into games with highly skilled players. If you are particularly adept at playing a certain game, it may be hard sometimes to get the level of competition that you need from your local group. BSW has a full spectrum of users with all levels of skill. You should be able to find people that challenge you.
Con: Sometimes it’s hard to avoid playing with a highly-skilled player. I’ve been in games where it was evident that I was getting killed and didn’t have a chance to play. That can sometimes not be much fun, and it can sometimes sour feelings to the game in general.
Pro: It is often the easiest way to try out a new game. New games often get their release on BSW around the actual time of release. For games that are only in German (or games from Essen), BSW often allows you a chance to see a new game before you would ever be able to get a hard copy in your grubby little hands.
Con: Gameplay on BSW is often not the same as FTF games, and this can sometimes give you a skewed view of what you will think of the actual game.
I’ve found that in the 7 years that I’ve been on BSW that my usage has fluctuated – partly due to interest and partly due to the amount of free time that I have. I find that it is a nice diversion, but it will never replace FTF boardgaming for me. I will continue to use it to try new games or games that I don’t own; but I always have to make a point of remembering that the gaming experience on BSW can be widely divergent from a FTF game.
What are your experiences with BSW? Can you live without it? Are there other pros and cons that I haven’t mentioned here?
Until your next appointment,
The Gaming Doctor
Comments:
You must register with BGN in order to comment. Registration is free, but if you appreciate the news, previews, reviews and other material posted on Boardgame News, please consider becoming a member to keep the info flowing to your screen!|
You forgot one Pro: You wont be mistaken by your brother ;-) Posted by Peer Sylvester on Jun 17, 2009 at 01:38 AM | #
|
|
One more disadvantage (IMO): many players on BSW refuse to play anything other than two-player games (presumably for metagame-reasons). My BSW usage has been fluctuating a lot, just like yours. That depends on time available, other interests and short-term addictions to a particular game (Puerto Rico a few years ago, Dominion last year). I’m still keeping an eye on the site for an opportunity to try out new games (or expansions), but it will never replace fact-to-face gaming. Marcel (BSW alias: Mac-S) Posted by Marcel Sagel on Jun 17, 2009 at 03:15 AM | #
|
|
I like the CONCEPT of BSW, but find the execution of it not the best. It is clunky and hard to navigate for newbies. Plus, the whole system isn’t streamlined. I’d REALLY like to see a well designed version of the site for a global audience, with automatic match making, constant updates of games, and all the modern improvements people have come to enjoy from online game play (stat tracking, friend lists, ect). I’m sure if someone charged something like $10 a month for a service like this it would do fairly well. The only problem would be getting the rights to put popular games up and to set it all up (managing it wouldn’t be so bad). Posted by Stefan Lopuszanski on Jun 17, 2009 at 04:43 AM | #
|
|
One major advantage is that you can play from home, even if you’re the only adult there. We’ve managed some great game days with participants all over the world. The downside, of course, is that we don’t get to game together in real life all that often. Posted by Melissa Rogerson on Jun 17, 2009 at 06:10 AM | #
|
|
"Con: It removes a lot of the social aspect of gaming” I only started playing on BSW last year, and one of the things I like about it is that I can often find someone from Germany or France to play Dominion with, so I can practice my German or French. And usually, the people online are very nice and indulge me in my basic language skills. But just last week, when I asked my opponent, “I’m from Chicago. Where are you from?” they replied, “I’m only here to play, not talk.” Ouch. Posted by Scott Tepper on Jun 17, 2009 at 06:39 AM | #
|
|
@Scott: I think that is weird. I mean, you play to be social, don’t you? What kind of people play that way?
Posted by Patrik Strömer on Jun 17, 2009 at 08:10 AM | #
|
|
@Patrik - It might seem weird to you (and to myself) - but I have also run into people like that on BSW that really have no interest in chatting—they simply want to play the games. Of course, I have no idea what their motivation is. Maybe they are a single parent, and they’ve managed to find 30 minutes where their children are all sleeping or otherwise occupied, and all they want to do is get in a game of Power Grid—so any chatting/talking will only slow things down and make it less likely that they finish. Who knows? Anyways, when you ask them online, they never take the time to answer you! <g> Dale Posted by Dale Yu on Jun 17, 2009 at 08:22 AM | #
|
|
It’s great that BSW exists, Dale, but for me, it’s far from a Killer App. I only tried to log on once, found the interface too confusing, and logged off after only 5 minutes. But even if the interface was crystal clear, I doubt I’d use the site much. Like you, I miss the interaction in a non-FTF game. It’s not like I’m chatting all the time when I play with my friends, but the total lack of any other humans in the room is just too much for me. I also find I tend to take longer in any game that’s shown on a computer screen, rather than on a board in front of me. Maybe that has something to do with the graphics, or the lack of atmosphere, or maybe the different pacing of a PC game, but it’s pretty standard for me. Consequently, I’m always aware of slowing the game down, which is an unpleasant feeling. As a result, I prefer to play such games against AI players, who don’t care how long I take. Finally, it seems to me that there’s a global groupthink on BSW that can affect how some of the games are played. Without direct access myself, I can’t be sure of this, so it may be an unfair characterization, but I hear so many things from BSW veterans that don’t match what I find in my FTF games. Maybe they’re more skilled or possess more insights into the games, but I haven’t ruled out the possibility that certain styles take hold on the site and can warp the way that certain games are played. At any rate, I do just fine without BSW. Limiting myself to FTF games limits the amount of gaming I do, but I appreciate the games I do get to play that much more. Posted by Larry Levy on Jun 17, 2009 at 10:00 AM | #
|
|
I really liked BSW when I was entering the hobby. Neat place to try out some more games. I learned a few games totally online before buying them myself (Attika springs to mind). The barrier to entry was steep as the English-speaking audience didn’t have as easy a time setting up as they do now. But I had fun. Over time, I’ve soured on it. The metagame kills it for me. All of the two-player gaming drives me nuts and it’s really hard to get anything else going unless the game is fairly new. Now I really only consider going there for Tichu. That’s the only game that you can constantly count on having a good game. Posted by Michael Denman on Jun 17, 2009 at 10:06 AM | #
|
|
Great article, I concur on most of your points. I do want to disagree with the characterization that people quit games because of the won-loss stats. In my experience, 99% of the time when there’s any sort of a problem with a BSW user, that user is unregistered. Unregistered users don’t have stats beyond their current session. They also have no accountability connected to their account, which is why they’re far more likely to behave badly and why many of us refuse to play with them. It’s a great mystery why BSW even allows unregistered users.
BTW Dale, I bought Dominion as soon as it was released purely because of it being on BSW. I’d ignored the hype and had no intention to look into it… until it showed up on BSW. A 2-game tryout was enough to sell me on it. Posted by Jonathan Morton on Jun 17, 2009 at 10:11 AM | #
|
|
I love BSW, although my usage also waxes and wanes. The ability to play games at 3 AM when not sleepy is great. Fortunately, I cannot get to it at work, so I only “waste” time here and BGG. Lately, it’s been mostly Dominion and often with three of us (the younger Dominion addicts and me) in the same room. :) The autoshuffling is a really nice feature. I’ve had some interesting conversations and like Scott T. mentioned, I’ve managed to practice/inflict my German on unsuspecting users. And sometimes you find people that don’t want to talk. But there are people like that in real life gaming, too. One friend of mine “talks” a lot online as a result, he usually “knows” people wherever he travels and gets a chance to play with them in real life. The interface is often regarded as clunky, but I’ve never had a real issue with it. Every time they change it, I have to relearn how to get in a game and sometimes that’s not intuitive, but actually playing the games has always seemed pretty good. I am not sure if a pay to play would work. Game Table has tried and I played there for a while, but, at least in its early days, it wasn’t as easy to find players. Days of Wonder’s site is nice, but I’ve only used it with free time from purchasing games. All in all, I am glad it’s available. Posted by Scott Russell on Jun 17, 2009 at 10:22 AM | #
|
|
BSW is not a good interface. There have been improvements over time, but they are not consistent. Consider one of their latest additions, Pandemic. This is a UI epic failure. They have no sense of how to design intuitive or simple interfaces, and they don’t care. At no point have I seen any feedback about a game result in a “fix”. In fact, responses I have received indicate that they do not even acknowledge that their problems are problems. Posted by Jim Cote on Jun 17, 2009 at 01:05 PM | #
|
|
Scott’s point on Dominion is good. I play with both my 10 year old and my 6 year old, at their request. If we play in person, the shuffling that I don’t usually mind becomes a massive chore, because I have to shuffle for everyone in the game. By comparison, on BSW it’s done for them. To play one game takes 5 minutes (with a skilled friend) to 20 minutes (with one of the kids). One game in person, with me shuffling for both girls, can take over an hour. There’s no contest. Posted by Melissa Rogerson on Jun 17, 2009 at 05:24 PM | #
|
|
I don’t play on BSW as one of the big points of boardgaming is playing face to face and enjoying the company. I have tried occasionally to connect to far flung friends and play a little on BSW but none are willing to committ to the previous difficult setups to get the thing working. (And our schedules are tough to synchronize.) When I would play with a friend there and open our games to others, we would get insulted and “yelled at” by others thinking we were colluding at the game when we mentioned we two were talking while we were playing (via Skype or some other VoIP method.) Scott & Melissa - It had never occured to me to play on BSW in the same room with someone to save on the shuffling chores… I’ll have to keep that in mind as my youngster(s) get older. Final comment: I feel “pressured” to play well and play fast on BSW since I’m playing with live people. I far prefer to flex my mental muscles against lamer computer AI like Saint Petersburg, Puerto Rico, etc… where I can take my time and pause the game if my family needs my attention… Posted by Matt J. Carlson on Jun 17, 2009 at 10:05 PM | #
|
|
Good point, Matt. The people at BSW are real, not computer players. I realize this and think most playing there do also. But my wife sometimes has trouble with the concept. “Can’t you just save the game and finish later?” My most hilarious bail on BSW was a guy playing that all of a sudden typed, “My wife is home, I have to go!” and disconnected. The rest of us had fun speculating exactly what that meant. IIRC, we did eventually get a replacement. Posted by Scott Russell on Jun 18, 2009 at 07:04 AM | #
|
|
First of all a little bit information about myself on Brettspielwelt. I happen to be there since 2001, sometimes more active sometimes not that active. For me BSW is more than just an online gaming platform as I happen to know very many people there personally throughout the years. This is caused by small to big offline events, were people from the Brettspielwelt gather. The community and the people nowadays mean more to me than the pure gaming platform. i think I can truly say I found some friends for life there. Below I try to directly reply to some of the quotes.. Cheers Klaus
---
The roster of games is bigger than 35, but these 35 games are prominently displayed. the other one are still reachable through the “archive”. I think BSW right offers approximately 75 multiplayer games. The list you mention doesn´t show the full list.
---
I’d REALLY like to see a well designed version of the site for a global audience, with automatic match making, constant updates of games, and all the modern improvements people have come to enjoy from online game play (stat tracking, friend lists, ect). I’m sure if someone charged something like $10 a month for a service like this it would do fairly well. The only problem would be getting the rights to put popular games up and to set it all up (managing it wouldn’t be so bad).
A pay services won´t happen as this directly conflicts with the opinion of ARMistice the founder of the site. He “invented” it in the 90s to play settlers online and it grew from there… Stat tracking and friendlists are available on BSW. I agree for a first look the BSW ionterface might look clunky and hard to navigate for a first timer, but getting used to it is very easy IMHO. ---
---
Finally, it seems to me that there’s a global groupthink on BSW that can affect how some of the games are played. Without direct access myself, I can’t be sure of this, so it may be an unfair characterization, but I hear so many things from BSW veterans that don’t match what I find in my FTF games. Maybe they’re more skilled or possess more insights into the games, but I haven’t ruled out the possibility that certain styles take hold on the site and can warp the way that certain games are played. At any rate, I do just fine without BSW. Limiting myself to FTF games limits the amount of gaming I do, but I appreciate the games I do get to play that much more.
If you like you can improve the interaction using Skype or something like that. if you only play with a small subset of gamers you can have groupthink happening (let it be FTF or BSW). However you can learn that much playing with the “cracks” at BSW. Every game of Power Grid basically is a learning experience for me as the skill level is very high among many of the gamers.
---
No need to feel pressurized, that is only a problem if you play with “the wrong people”. It is just a matter of information and agreements before starting a game.
---
You really need not to care for the Metagame. it is just an additional layer for those who like to have more to it. Posted by Klaus Knechtskern on Jun 18, 2009 at 09:33 AM | #
|
|
"No need to feel pressurized, that is only a problem if you play with ‘the wrong people’.” I can’t speak for anyone else, Klaus, but the reason I’m sensitive about possibly playing too slow isn’t because I’m afraid I’ll get yelled at, but because I don’t want to be unfair to the other players. If I’m concerned that I’ll slow the game down too much for them, I’d just as soon stay away and let them play with someone faster. Posted by Larry Levy on Jun 18, 2009 at 07:49 PM | #
|
|
Larry, I think it is just a matter to make clear up front how you like to play the game. I your pace will be slow, just mention it before starting, if the other players have a problem with that, they will tell you. Posted by Klaus Knechtskern on Jun 19, 2009 at 04:46 AM | #
|
|
Pro-BSW gets the rules right the first time more often than my gaming group. Con-You can’t play houserules on BSW. Posted by Jennifer Schlickbernd on Jun 19, 2009 at 08:38 AM | #
|
|
There is no way that you can claim BSW game experiences are different from face-to-face experiences. The skill level and metagame is pretty much the same. On a completely unrelated note, the silver strategy breaks Dominion. /tongue-in-cheek Posted by Stephen Schaefer on Jun 19, 2009 at 02:51 PM | #
|
Next entry: Board 2 Pieces June 18, 2009
Previous entry: Preußische Ostbahn Coming Again – But From Whom?





































