|
|
|
|
Ryan B.: How I Rate Designers and Other Quibblings
I briefly got a chance to read over some articles and was able to peruse Larry’s column about rating designers he likes. I admit mine is a much simpler rating system – it’s just called “gut feeling.”
So Bruno, never fear. You will get your props from me this week. Bruno Faidutti is one of my favorite designers, but I think he does his best work in collaborations. Larry is right in saying he is Mr. Chaos (which is different than saying he is Mr. Luck) and the amount of chaos Mr. Faidutti inroduces is refreshing...to a point.
Christophe Boelinger gets credit from me for his A Dog’s Life. Although it needed a fair amount of work to be viable, I am looking to see his next effort in a similar genre because I think he brings something classic, yet special to the table in the way he designs.
Reiner Knizia is also a favorite, but I do think it quite funny in one sense. I always thought his best work was in card games more so than board games. Lost Cities and Poison are two of my favorites there.
Finally, I leave for your pondering, the one person who I believe shows an incredible design versatility and is the heir apparent to Mr. Sackson for bringing simple, elegant and intelligent games to the masses: Alan Moon. Ticket to Ride is the pinnacle of such effective, engaging and readily understandable strategic boardgame design.
But as much as I keep on the lookout for these designers, I also keep sight lines to the companies which manufacture their games, so here is my side journey for today. Try as I might, I finally will raise the white flag publicly. I just don’t think I am a “gamer,” per se. I enjoy the experience of board games, particularly with people I know on some level personally, but I have noticed that I have no great desire to buy more than two or three games that strike my fancy in a coming year. And I own only about 20-25 board games, period and I am pretty happy – whereas I have seen the typical “gamer” collection easily run over a hundred games and the gamer feel his collection is still too unsatisfyingly small. I have also noticed that some people (mostly gamers) are quite comfortable sitting down to a board game with people they don’t know. I guess for them it is about “the game.”
I am not comfortable in that situation, however. I don’t criticize it, certainly, and there are a couple of people I have met through a game group in my area that I think are great guys, but on the whole, it’s not my usual cup of tea. For instance, I just don’t get any sort of overriding desire to go to BGG.Con .
And BoardGameGeek?
For me it is a resource, a tool. Nothing more. I don’t get caught up in all of its nuances, although I do enjoy it and think the upgrade they did was long overdue. Hmmm, that statement should fan the flames of dissension! (But yes, I think it is a great site.)
The experience of games is about people for me and I guess I would much rather play a game with one person that I know or have an active business or personal interest in, than six people that I don’t know from Adam. I guess being in sales, the human experience of games interests me far more than the game experience. Hopefully, that doesn’t sound arrogant because it is not meant to be. But I also think that some “gamers” automatically have the expectation that for you, too, it should always be about “the game.”
24/7.
Comments:
No comments yet. You must register with BGN in order to comment. Registration is free, but if you appreciate the news, previews, reviews and other material posted on Boardgame News, please consider becoming a member to keep the info flowing to your screen!Next entry: Musings on… For Sale (#26)
Previous entry: The Dice Tower: Episode 36 - Our Top Ten Games for Six Players
































